
蜘蛛直播官网 11月14日讯 阿斯顿维拉与桑德兰的精彩对决,在24直播网实时呈现,由『财神阿天』主播,确保流畅观看,并提供详尽的赛事回顾与比分更新,体验无阻碍的观赛乐趣。
访问24直播网,您将能实时目睹“财神阿天”带来的阿斯顿维拉与桑德兰的精彩对决,并享有赛事的全面回顾以及比分更新的便利。画面流畅无延迟,回放功能亦十分卓越。
内部报道指出:前律师对马特塔提出54万欧元的佣金索偿要求,其巴黎住所已被用作抵押并实施查封。
11月13日,体育新闻传来重磅消息,据《队报》披露,法国籍球员、水晶宫队攻击手让-菲利普·马特塔与他的前法律顾问皮埃尔-亨利·博维斯之间的五年之久法律争端细节浮出水面。博维斯指责马特塔未支付高达54万欧元的佣金,且已向法院提出对马特塔位于巴黎的住所实施临时查封的申请。
争议起因:美因茨俱乐部续约协议及10%中介费问题
In 2018, Bovis was appointed as Mata's legal representative, tasked with resolving both personal and professional disputes, for which he was compensated at a rate of 4,200 euros monthly, along with a 5% fee on litigation outcomes. The following year, they inked a sports representation agreement where Bovis took charge of managing the player's career, in exchange for which he was entitled to 10% of Mata's earnings.
In June 2019, Matta extended his contract with the Bundesliga's Mainz for an additional two years, a deal in which Bovis played a role. According to well-informed sources, Bovis refrained from accepting any fees at the time, choosing instead to profit from the player's future transfer. Nevertheless, in July 2020, Matta terminated Bovis's services and engaged a new legal representative. In 2021, Matta was loaned to Crystal Palace, later securing a permanent move. Bovis asserts that Matta is obligated to pay a 10% commission, amounting to 540,000 euros, as stipulated in the German renewal agreement. Following unsuccessful attempts to collect the payment, Bovis applied to the Paris Bar Association for a payment order, which was granted. However, this decision was overturned by the Paris Appeal Court in 2023.
焦点争议:授权文件签署的具体时刻
体育授权文件的合法性成为上诉法院首要审查对象。马特塔的法律顾问团队强调,该授权文件于2019年7月27日签署,比美因茨的续约合同晚了六个月,据此认为博维斯无权要求提成。然而,博维斯一方坚决否认此说法,声称文件实际签署于2019年1月27日,并在同年2月就按照规定提交给了法国足协。博维斯不仅向法院提交了笔迹鉴定专家的评估报告,还独立向司法法院提起诉讼,预计案件的核心审理将在明年春季展开。在此期间,博维斯已向法院申请了对马特塔位于巴黎的住宅实施临时查封。
最新裁决:上诉法庭对球员的诉讼请求予以拒绝
在质疑若干发票真实性问题上,马特塔曾发起刑事诉讼,不过此案最终未获批准。继此之后,他进一步发起了民事诉讼,目前,此一诉讼案件的相关司法审查工作正逐渐走向完成。
7月8日当周,马特塔对巴黎住所的暂时性抵押权进行了挑战。他强调,凭借每年450万欧元的收入,作为奥运银牌得主及法国国家队成员,他的财务状况透明,有能力随时支付相关费用,因而不应遭受财产冻结。但到了2026年10月15日,巴黎高等法院对他的上诉做出了否定。法院指出,马特塔在英国就业,在法国仅持有该抵押房产,且自2020年起便对合同有效性提出质疑,却未向法庭提交实质性诉讼请求,这些行为对债权回收构成了潜在威胁。目前,该房产的临时抵押状态依然保持。
HOT NEWS